On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Alex Mauer <ha...@hawkesnest.net> wrote: > On 08/12/2010 09:00 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Paul Johnson >> <baloo-PVOPTusIyP/sroww+9z...@public.gmane.org> wrote: >>> bicycle=designated is all a sharrow means in OSM terms. >> >> No, there are other kinds of designation covered by bicycle=designated. > > He wasn’t saying that bicycle=designated is always a sharrow, but that a > sharrow is effectively the same thing as a sign saying “bike route”. > They’re both ways of marking something as a designated route for bicycles.
But it's not effectively the same thing. If it were, sharrows wouldn't have ever been invented. Now, Steve (and Mike), what's wrong (if anything) with bicycle=designated; sharrow=yes? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
