John Smith wrote: > The current process is/was flawed completely, as someone else pointed > out, how much weight can you put in a process that only very few > people have anything to do with when there is 5-10k active editors?
Low participation doesn't make the process flawed, as it isn't supposed to be a democratic vote among all contributors in the first place. It's just a way to define good tagging solutions. Having a debate involving 5-10k mappers doesn't work, but skipping discussion and inventing tags based on the experiences of a single mapper who encounters a feature for the first time doesn't produce quality results either. Getting a few people who care about the issue to discuss it and agree on a written result will produce good results, however. And the wiki RFC + voting process is a possible way to make exactly that happen. Tobias Knerr _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
