John Smith wrote: > On 15 June 2010 13:33, Zeke Farwell <ezeki...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Steve, >> I like this as a possible solution as well. Perhaps the admin_level tag >> could be used? Same as for boundaries. The challenges in my eyes are not >> making the tagging scheme overly complicated, and making if verifiable based >> on physical characteristics. In my opinion OSM only needs three levels max, >> and maybe two would do it. >> > > so to avoid naming confusion you could do... > > aerodrome=major > aerodrome=minor > aerodrome=small
These are adjectives & therefore subjective; "How small is your small compared to my small. Is it bigger than my small?" etc,etc. Also to me small doesn't fit too well with major/minor. The reason I mentioned the official classifications is that they would be verifiable. Cheers Dave F. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging