On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:58 AM, y...@o2.pl <y...@o2.pl> wrote: > > We can > continue discussion at 'residential_home' proposal > (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Residential_home). > RFC is open since 2009 but there are still things we need to solve: > > * name: 'residential_home' or 'assisted_living' (maybe sth. else)?
amenity=assisted_living, because (if?) in all cases you are describing a place where people *live* with *assistance*. > * sub-tagging: 'residents' or main tag value > (residential_home=*/assisted_living=*) > * sub-tags value 'children'/'seniors'/etc. or 'orphanage'/'nursing > home'/etc. (hospice maybe?) IMHO, the "cascading" style (A=B + B=C) should ONLY be used when C is a type of B and B is a type of A. Therefore, these two options are both valid: amenity=assisted_living + assisted_living=orphanage, OR amenity=assisted_living + residents=children. I prefer the second, however, you could allow both simultaneously if you see a need for it. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
