On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:55 PM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On 20 May 2010 06:28, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > > One problem I have with the concept of "access=destination", even beyond > the > > fact that it says "right of access", is that parking lots quite often > aren't > > connected to the places they serve. Something like access=customer is > > therefore *more general*. The parking lot might be across the street > from > > the destination. Is "access=destination" accurate then? > > I did make a comment about access=customer/access=destination the > other day, in both cases you would nearly need a relation to link the > car park to the shop that has claim to 1 or more parking spaces. > > As for your example above, the car park is the destination by car for > going to certain shops, after that you need to walk, if you are > walking or any other form of transport you most likely don't need to > care about the car park. > The car park is the destination by car for going anywhere, if what you are doing is parking there. Access=destination would be for a public parking lot with a sign that says "no through traffic".
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
