On 20 May 2010 06:28, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > One problem I have with the concept of "access=destination", even beyond the > fact that it says "right of access", is that parking lots quite often aren't > connected to the places they serve. Something like access=customer is > therefore *more general*. The parking lot might be across the street from > the destination. Is "access=destination" accurate then?
I did make a comment about access=customer/access=destination the other day, in both cases you would nearly need a relation to link the car park to the shop that has claim to 1 or more parking spaces. As for your example above, the car park is the destination by car for going to certain shops, after that you need to walk, if you are walking or any other form of transport you most likely don't need to care about the car park. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
