On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:13 AM, John Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... Obviously if > someone wants to spend a lot of time areas would be more accurate, but > in that case it might as well be left as a raster image.
No, because with a raster image, you can't: 1) route to/from an object within the image 2) calculate the area of an object within the image 3) calculate the centerline of an object within the image 4) TAG AN OBJECT within a raster image (as it has no boundaries). etc etc etc. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
