John Smith wrote: > On 1 February 2010 02:34, Dave F. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The width=* tag doesn't fit when you have a gradual change in width as >> you would do on a track. >> > > I would have thought that was the best case for Richard's suggestion, > irregular shapes being the worst case.
If your referring to the Watkins Glenn configuration (Some of Richard's posts may not have come through to me) & I'm understanding Richards requirements, the River/Riverbank could be the solution: Use multi-polygons for the boundaries of the track/pit lanes etc. Then add separate ways for to indicate each track configuration. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
