On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> wrote: > I think I am having a deja-vu. The very reason people added the > highway=path proposal (almost exactly 2 years ago) was to "provide a > value for a nonspecific or multi-use path." > (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Path).
Did it catch on? As I said in my other post, Mapnik renders it totally differently to either footway or cycleway. Is that an anomaly or an accurate reflection of current usage? Either way I'm pretty sure that there are lots of "highway=path" out there intended to mean dirt paths, whereas I would say both "highway=footway" and "highway=cycleway" would mean paved by default. Steve _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
