On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > > I spotted two or three bicyclists near two or three pedestrians. Looks > like > > shared-use, which means highway=path. > > I vehemently object to this rule that "shareduse means highway=path". > I think the wiki just hasn't caught up with reality yet. > > The reason I object is that non-shared-use cycleways are practically > non existent in most countries, rendering the cycleway=* tag pretty > much useless. Heh, you say that as though it's a bad thing. I think the cycleway tag already is pretty much useless. So, what's your definition of "cycleway"? On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Liz <ed...@billiau.net> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Dec 2009, Anthony wrote: > > Still, I think > > I spotted two or three bicyclists near two or three pedestrians. Looks > > like shared-use, which means highway=path. > > No > a cycleway is a way which is free of bicycle obstructions and that is not > implicit in the path at all. > Sounds like 95% of ways tagged with highway=*, including many ones where bicycles aren't allowed.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
