Mike Harris
> -----Original Message----- > From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org > [mailto:tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Roy Wallace > Sent: 10 December 2009 05:50 > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > Subject: Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Steve Bennett > <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Yep. Fortunately, there aren't too many ways which use both > >> highway=* and barrier=*. > > > > Yeah...but still. I'm not a fan of having "bicycle=no" mean two > > similar, but distinctly different things, when applied to different > > kinds of objects. > > +1. The solution when this happens, I think, is to "split" the tag > into two (or more) new tags, like bicycle:legal=* and > bicycle:practical=*. > > Much like maxheight:legal and maxheight:physical. > Not a bad idea ... Wonder whether it would catch on ... And when the renderers would catch up ? Worth a thought though ... > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
