2009/10/14 Gilles Corlobé <gil...@corlobe.tk>: >> Joseph > In my opinion, the tag "landuse=military" should only be used for specificly > military activities, like those discribed in the wiki. > Some of you have suggested to create 2 areas, covering the same place. I > don't think this is correct. One of you said that's done every day. How can > it be? There can't be a forest inside a residential area. The residential > area stops where begins the forest (and the contrary). > Gilles
might be true for residential and forest (still if it is a small forest could IMHO be as well inside the residential area), but there is other examples where e.g. forest or lake or railway-area or sth. else is inside another landuse, thus being part of it. Think of parks, a lake in the forest, a forest in a nature reserve, a forest in a military area, ... If it is not part of it, it has to be excluded by the use of a multipolygon-relation. cheers, Martin PS: What about continuing this discussion only in tagging-ML? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
