2009/10/13 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > 2009/10/13 Gilles Corlobé <gil...@corlobe.tk>: >> Hello everybody, >> >> I propose to add a tag "boundary=military" : the problem is that, with the >> existing tags, it's almost impossible to mark correctly lots of data, like >> (non limitative list) forest, scholl, parking lot, … >> >> Rather than multiplying the "military=*" tag, I suggest to only mark the >> external limit of the military area. >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Military_base > > This does not sound completely strange, but still incorporates some > problems (all currently tagged landuse=military will get deprecated). > I don't see the big problem here, as you can > 1. draw a landuse=military around the whole area (and probably > military=barracks) > 2. draw a landuse=forest around the actual forest > 3. draw a landuse=school around the actual school (or building=school > for the school-building) > 4. draw and tag the parking_lot where it is. > > IMHO landuse=military is already what you want to express with > boundary=military. The boundary-object can be tagged as > barrier=fence/wall/whatever with entrances, gates, videosurveillance > etc.
What about using a relation to add secondary land uses? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
