On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Mike N. <nice...@att.net> wrote: >> Just because you're using address interpolation doesn't mean you have >> to use the Karlsruhe Schema, though. If you have no idea where a >> house is other than it's relative location on a street, you shouldn't >> use the Karlsruhe Schema. You shouldn't randomly tag locations away >> from the street, if all you know is a location on the street. > > I'm still not convinced that the Tiger Schema / Estimated tagging is any > different from the Karlsruhe Schema, except for precision - all of which > could be resolved by adding level of precision tags to the Karlsruhe Schema.
I suppose it's possible. You can duplicate the way(s), stick the new way in some random nearby spot, and add a tag which denotes the fact that the way is in a random spot. I can't imagine why you'd want to do that, but you can. Actually, I can imagine why you'd want to do it. It's called tagging for the renderers and the editors. > A relation would work, but would certainly hide addressing details from > any untrained community wishing to submit corrections. We shouldn't jump through convoluted hoops avoiding relations simply because the editors don't yet make relations easy to edit. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
