[sysvinit-devel] insserv no longer understand X-Interactive: true

[Petter Reinholdtsen]

Hi, Werner.  Take a look at <URL: http://bugs.debian.org/580564 >.
I've verified this with our test suite, and insserv no longer
understand the X-Interactive: true header.  This test suite function
fail:

test_x_interactive() {
echo
echo "info: Check if X-Interactive header work"
echo "BTS #458224"
echo
  
initdir_purge

# Insert a few scripts to flesh out $initdir
insertscript first <<EOF || true
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides:          first
# Required-Start:
# Required-Stop:
# Default-Start:     2
# Default-Stop:      0
### END INIT INFO
EOF

# This test if X-Interactive work with existing scripts when a new
# script is inserted.
insertscript alone1 <<'EOF' || true
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides:          alone1
# Required-Start:    first
# Required-Stop:     first
# Default-Start:     2
# Default-Stop:      0
# X-Interactive:     true
### END INIT INFO
EOF

insertscript after <<'EOF' || true
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides:          after
# Required-Start:    first
# Required-Stop:     first
# Default-Start:     2
# Default-Stop:      0
### END INIT INFO
EOF

# This test if X-Interactive work with new scripts too.  The code
# paths in insserv are different for the two cases.
insertscript alone2 <<'EOF' || true
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides:          alone2
# Required-Start:    first
# Required-Stop:     first
# Default-Start:     2
# Default-Stop:      0
# X-Interactive:     true
### END INIT INFO
EOF

list_rclinks

check_script_present 2 first
check_script_present 2 after
check_script_present 2 alone1
check_script_present 2 alone2
check_order 2 first after
check_order 2 first alone1
check_order 2 first alone2
# This ordering is not guaranteed, but currently interactive scripts
# are put after the others on the same level.
check_order 2 alone1 after
check_order 2 alone2 after
if grep INTERACTIVE ${initddir}/.depend.start | grep -q alone1 &&
    grep INTERACTIVE ${initddir}/.depend.start | grep -q alone1 ; then
    counttest
else
    error "scripts alone1 and alone2 are not flagged as interactive" 
fi
}

Any clue what is wrong?

Happy hacking,
-- 
Petter Reinholdtsen