That sounds like a good, achievable idea. I'll look into it. My group theory is a little rusty, but not too bad.
On Friday, February 10, 2017 at 12:53:01 PM UTC-6, Kalevi Suominen wrote: > > > > On Friday, February 10, 2017 at 7:54:27 PM UTC+2, Ian George wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> So, first, I'm just getting started with Sympy, so if I'm missing >> something obvious, forgive me. >> >> The Lie Algebra module only seems to handle the A-G groups. Wouldn't it >> be prudent to add on SO(3), SU(2), U(1), stuff that tends to be used by >> physicists/representation theorists more often? I'm checking out the >> physics module, too, but so far haven't found anything. >> >> As a side note, that might be a good first step toward contributing, >> seeing if you can do something with representation theory here. Of course, >> I've got to brush up on that, before I even consider it, having been away >> from physics for a while... >> > > I could not find it explicitly pointed out, but it seems to me too that > only complex simple Lie algebras have been dealt with. It would be useful > to have an implementation of real simple Lie algebras as well. You are > welcome to contribute. > > Kalevi Suominen > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/92975165-1269-419a-a2df-6ccc65edf176%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
