That remark is quite important. In the same spirit I would like to know if
there are any arguments for using an expression for the representation
instead of a function (the use of x_1 or x_dummy or whatever seems awkward
(personal opinion!)).

Maybe one such argument is that using a function instead of an expression
breaks the (possible) reuse of code between the implementation for discreet
and continuous bases. (I'm really shooting in the dark here!)

Anyhow, I would like to know what the others think about that. Using
functions seems more natural to me (no x_dummies for one).

Stefan

On 7 June 2011 21:41, Øyvind Jensen <[email protected]> wrote:

> I haven't dived into the quantum module, so I don't know how to answer
> your question.  But I think maybe it will be easier to find a good
> solution if you look at it from the other end.  What is it that you
> ultimately want to do?  What is the intended use of the function you
> are implementing?
>
> Øyvind
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to