On Mon Jun 30, 2025 at 4:55 AM CEST, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: > From what I understand as someone who isn't a lawyer but has done > licensing audits for applications in Ubuntu and Debian, you'll only > run into issues if you publish *built binaries* of your code.
That technically may be true, but it is a stupid idea. You don’t do open source software, which nobody can package and distribute. And apparently FSF doesn’t agree with my analysis: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#v2v3Compatibility So, my only advice is to relicense your new program under GPLv2 and send FSF to … Apparently, you will be in the distinguished company of Linus Torvalds and many others. Best, Matěj -- http://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, @mc...@en.osm.town GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8 For those of you who think we are descendents from those cavemen who stood and fought with dinosaurs, you must be nuts, we are descendents from the ones who ran like hell to live.
E09FEF25D96484AC.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
