On 08/02/2012 02:59 PM, Chris Little wrote: > On 08/02/2012 11:54 AM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote: >> On 08/01/2012 09:17 PM, Chris Little wrote: >>> End tags like \fqa* make little difference. Without the relaxed processing, >>> the only difference my script makes is to not delete these end tags. >> >> Simply deleting \fqa* might not have the intended effect. For example, >> \f + xxxx could also be translated \fqa yyyy \fqa*or \fqa zzzz\fqa*.\f* >> does not mean the same thing as >> \f + xxxx could also be translated \fqa yyyy or \fqa zzzz.\f* >> but does mean the same thing as >> \f + xxxx could also be translated \fqa yyyy \ft or \fqa zzzz\ft .\f* > > I delete end tags like \fqa* as a final step in my footnote processor, > before which, all note-internal tags that begin \f- are treated > identically and will cause the closure of the previous tag. So your > first and third cases get treated identically, just as when a \fqa* precedes > \ft in the third case.
Good. :-) Thank you. _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
