On 08/01/2012 09:17 PM, Chris Little wrote: > End tags like \fqa* make little difference. Without the relaxed processing, > the only difference my script makes is to not delete these end tags.
Simply deleting \fqa* might not have the intended effect. For example, \f + xxxx could also be translated \fqa yyyy \fqa*or \fqa zzzz\fqa*.\f* does not mean the same thing as \f + xxxx could also be translated \fqa yyyy or \fqa zzzz.\f* but does mean the same thing as \f + xxxx could also be translated \fqa yyyy \ft or \fqa zzzz\ft .\f* > But if someone is still using \ss to mark a subsection, I'd like the person > running the converter to be cognizant of the fact that they're working with > legacy markup and I want them to have to make a conscious decision to go on > using a USFM converter on non-USFM docs. I agree that this merits some sort of nonfatal warning. _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
