On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dm Smith wrote: > >> Chris, don't take it as criticism or a put down. I don't mean it >> that way. I appreciate all your hard work and your contributions! > > Seconded, wholeheartedly.
Agreed! It seems on my hearings on the list that the main reason we can't have the modules in a repository, at current, is that some have licensing restrictions and, even if they don't, we don't have the source documents for the largest portion of them. And the mod2xml tool is broken, no? It seems, though, that putting the ones which are legal to store in a repository into said repository would be excellent. Is my understanding of the status of mod2xml correct? Could that use with some fixing up and from there move to storing some of the modules in a repository. Running them through Chris still seems like an excellent idea, as he does a marvelous job, but if he could have the source in subversion, other people could see and make edits to it and notify him, and then he'd just be able to pull the latest copy out of there and update the modules. It would also serve as a good learning tool for the people who are always asking for example module import files other than the KJV - which is the only one I know of to exist in a pre-import OSIS format. --Greg > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
