I still deny that it is better. I remain unconvinced that use of <q> to generate punctuation should be mandatory. Maybe I just don't like computer geeks telling linguists & Bible translators what to do. Maybe I have some valid reasons that you should consider.
What if the rendering of quote markings was a user option. One option would be to render the markings just as they were in the source/printed document. Or, the user could select a quoting style. This way the linguists & translators would have their say, and the user could either accept them or ignore them if the user so desires. Put another way, the user could be inspired to go with what the linguists & translators provided or the user could be inspired to use one of the options the computer geeks were inspired to provide. On the other hand, we could have some guy be a world wide overseer who would have ultimate authority to determine what quoting method would be correct for each document and we could all submit to him.
Jerry
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
