> So I guess the initial ghost entry fix worked for you? :)
Yes, thanks.
> Actually, any of the positioners should return an out of bounds error if
> the module is empty. Do they not? eg.
>
> module = TOP;
> if (module.Error())
> cout << "Module is empty\n";
Yes, again does not work:
371 module->deleteEntry();
372 module->getRawEntry();
373 module->SetKey(module->KeyText());
374 if(!module->Error()) {
...
After deleting the last remaining entry (when module becomes empty), module->
Error()==0. (It is RawLD.)
Actually what I need is namely check of module emptiness after deleteEntry().
Regards.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Please add SWModule::isEmpty() to check whether a module is empty, i.e.
> > containing zero entries (useful after opening module and after deleting an
> > entry).
> >
> > It is possible to do it with current interface, but in a silly mean.
--
Victor Porton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Victor Porton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
