> On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Christian Renz wrote: > A Chinese character in UTF-8, 3 bytes, represents a word, not an > alphabetical character, and should be treated as such in any s/w IMO.
Accordingly to this, it seems that we should insert (by a special filter) a zero-width word separator (not sure that I named this Unicode char correctly) between every two Chinese 'letters'. The problem however is that not all browsers used today render this char correctly. Or may be it isn't zero-width? -- Victor Porton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
