> On May 12, 2016, at 9:57 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-dev 
> <swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On May 12, 2016, at 9:16 PM, Russ Bishop <xen...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:xen...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 12, 2016, at 8:33 AM, Joe Groff <jgr...@apple.com 
>>> <mailto:jgr...@apple.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We might want to wait till we review Andy's UnsafeBytePointer proposal. If 
>>> we accept that, it will separate UnsafePointer<Void> into its own type.
>>> 
>>> -Joe
>> 
>> 
>> Fair enough; I can hold off on this branch until then.
> 
> I’d suggest wrapping up this proposal as specified.  When/if Andy’s proposal 
> goes through, we can move these APIs over.  This proposal is progress from 
> the status quo, perfection is the enemy of good after all.

That’s the right call. For the record, I suggested moving to/fromOpaque to 
initializers during the community review and it was immediately shot down by 
Jordan because it’s incorrect for UnsafePointer<T> where T is non-Void.

-Andy

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

Reply via email to