On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Russ Bishop via swift-dev
<swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:
> I’m implementing SE-0017 but based on the standard library guidelines I think
> Unmanaged should have initializers that take
> UnsafePointer/UnsafeMutablePointer and vice-versa which would fit more
> naturally with the way other conversions work.
>
> A later commit already moved toOpaque to be an initializer on OpaquePointer.
> I would add convenience initializers to UnsafePointer as well.
>
> Any objections to just implementing this as initializers and marking
> fromOpaque as deprecated? I’m not sure how strict we should be in sticking to
> the proposal.
Unmanaged shall be redesigned. We thought about this change, and
decided to go for the incremental change as proposed. Bigger changes
should be considered as a part of a cohesive Unmanaged redesign.
Dmitri
--
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <griboz...@gmail.com>*/
_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
