On 3 December 2012 20:46, Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote: > Less formal, I do not see much use in the single commit spanning both > sys and non-sys. We almost never should have such interlock, otherwise > ABI issues would cause troubles for people updating the system. > And spanning commits are somewhat more cumbersome to both merge, > revert and for non-developer to pick.
This isn't an issue of sys and non-sys being tied together. This is one of documentation and feature being committed together. -- Eitan Adler _______________________________________________ svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-stable-9 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-stable-9-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
