On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 07:58:09PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 3 December 2012 19:54, Konstantin Belousov <k...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Author: kib > > Date: Tue Dec 4 00:54:49 2012 > > New Revision: 243850 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/243850 > > > > Log: > > MFC r243341: > > Add a special meaning to the negative ticks argument for > > taskqueue_enqueue_timeout(). Do not rearm the callout if it is > > already armed and the ticks is negative. Otherwise rearm it to fire > > in abs(ticks) ticks in the future. > > Why was this not MFCed together with r243845 ?
Because r243845 was only committed today, and I do not see a need to postpone the merge of the fix for the (rare) bug. Less formal, I do not see much use in the single commit spanning both sys and non-sys. We almost never should have such interlock, otherwise ABI issues would cause troubles for people updating the system. And spanning commits are somewhat more cumbersome to both merge, revert and for non-developer to pick.
pgpeDBuWLPREV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
