On Tue, Jun 5, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Renato Botelho wrote: > On 05/06/18 15:26, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 12:13:05PM -0600, Brad Davis wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018, at 10:46 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > >>> I find it often very useful to do > >>> (cd src/etc/rc.d && make install) > >>> Same for defaults and several other directories which in fact > >>> contains> >>> non-editable content. Is this planned to keep working ? > >> > >> The short answer is, no. All rc.d scripts get moved to the src of > >> the program they start.> >> > >> That said, if there is a big need for this, we can see about > >> options to keep them working.> >> > >> What are you trying to accomplish when you do this? Just verify > >> the rc.d scripts match your src tree?> > > > I avoid mergemaster/etcupdate and whatever else. rc.d and /etc/rc, > > /etc/rc.subr /etc/rc.network are not suitable to etc, they are > > binaries> > provided by the project not for the user editing. > > > > When upgrading the host, esp. on HEAD, i usually refresh scripts > > by this> > procedure and avoid any editing and implied conflict resolution > > for real> > configs. > > > > Not being able to easily install clean copies of these scripts would> > be > > very inconvenient and time consuming. > > If I understood what Brad is saying, each rc.d script will be > installed> by the application it belongs to. So when it's installing SSH it > will> also install /etc/rc.d/sshd and you will not need to deal with rc.d > files on mergemaster anymore. > > Is it correct, Brad?
Correct. Regards, Brad Davis _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
