Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Consider a downstream vendor who has support for signed binary
> > executions.  If rtld allows a backdoor around exec(2) to run an unsigned
> > binary, that could be a problem for them.  It is on them to add support
> > to exec(2) to validate the special case of execing rtld with an
> > argument, or to just disable the feature in rtld from this commit.
> 
> Note the undocumented O_VERIFY flag in open(2) from the patch.
> This is very vendor-ish addition to request veriexec (?).

Yep, we make rtld use O_VERIFY so that it will not load/link anything
which is unsigned.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to