On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:37:42PM -0400, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
> On 05/15/2017 15:36, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:25:29PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 01:08:55PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> >>> Well, for example, it seems like it would allow anyone to execute a
> >>> binary even if the sysadmin had set it to -x specifically to prevent
> >>> people from running it.
> >>
> >> The direct mode does not (and cannot) honor set{u,g}id modes of the
> >> executable, so any binary run this way would only exercise the existing
> >> power of the user which did it.
> >>
> >> The most advanced explanation that I was given in private was among
> >> the lines: "if you have an environment where users can upload content
> >> to a shared server, but have no access to chmod(2), no compilers, no
> >> scripting languages, etc." The person then admitted that (s)he does not
> >> consider it as an actual concern.
> >
> > Would this now allow executing binaries (with or without +x bit) from
> > filesystems mounted with -o noexec?
> >
> > ./danfe
>
> No:
>
> # zfs create -o mountpoint=/mnt -o exec=off tank/TEST
> # cp /bin/sh /mnt/
> # /mnt/sh
> /mnt/sh: Permission denied.
> # /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 /mnt/sh
> /mnt/sh: mmap of data failed: Permission denied
This is due to
r313967 | kib | 2017-02-19 22:51:04 +0200 (Sun, 19 Feb 2017) | 24 lines
Apply noexec mount option for mmap(PROT_EXEC).
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
