Well as other pointed out there are some concerns with using enums from C++ and ABI prospective. So it looks to me that there is no general consensus on that direction.
-Max On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Gleb Smirnoff <gleb...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:40:50AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > M> That being said, is there any other socket option value in there > M> implemented as enum? I don't see anything obvious, so that I am curious > if > M> it would stick out as an odd one in there. What do you think? > > Simply because 30 years ago the language didn't allow that, and later > additions mimiced the older sockopts. We need to break this loop :) > > -- > Totus tuus, Glebius. > > _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
