On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:40:50AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: M> That being said, is there any other socket option value in there M> implemented as enum? I don't see anything obvious, so that I am curious if M> it would stick out as an odd one in there. What do you think?
Simply because 30 years ago the language didn't allow that, and later additions mimiced the older sockopts. We need to break this loop :) -- Totus tuus, Glebius. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
