On 10/21/15 17:42, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 10/21/2015 8:39 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 10/21/15 17:28, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 10/21/2015 8:01 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Author: hselasky
Date: Wed Oct 21 15:01:51 2015
New Revision: 289700
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/289700
Log:
Start process of moving the LinuxKPI into the default kernel build by
creating an empty directory tree.
Sponsored by: Mellanox Technologies
Added:
head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/
head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/
head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/
head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/asm/
head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/
head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src/
This makes me think a branch should be used instead.
Most of what will be done is "svn mv" out of "sys/ofed" and changing
some include paths in sys/modules and sys/conf . Can you explain why you
think a branch is required ?
Because you're splitting commits up that should otherwise not be split
up. There's no reason to commit empty directories before a 'svn mv' into
them.
OK, I see. Do you want me to revert the "svn add" and put it altogether
in a single commit, or is not not that big deal if I keep the next
linuxkpi file moving as a single commit?
--HPS
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
