On 10/21/2015 8:39 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 10/21/15 17:28, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 10/21/2015 8:01 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >>> Author: hselasky >>> Date: Wed Oct 21 15:01:51 2015 >>> New Revision: 289700 >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/289700 >>> >>> Log: >>> Start process of moving the LinuxKPI into the default kernel build by >>> creating an empty directory tree. >>> >>> Sponsored by: Mellanox Technologies >>> >>> Added: >>> head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/ >>> head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/ >>> head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/ >>> head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/asm/ >>> head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/ >>> head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src/ >>> >> >> This makes me think a branch should be used instead. >> > > Most of what will be done is "svn mv" out of "sys/ofed" and changing > some include paths in sys/modules and sys/conf . Can you explain why you > think a branch is required ?
Because you're splitting commits up that should otherwise not be split up. There's no reason to commit empty directories before a 'svn mv' into them. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
