> On 20 Aug 2015, at 13:13 , George Neville-Neil <g...@neville-neil.com> wrote: > > Why was this work not in Phabricator? This is a large change that has not > been reviewed, > as far as I can tell, by anyone else on the project. I am tempted to ask > that this be backed out > and reviewed BEFORE it goes into the tree.
I probably wouldn’t go as far as backing out. Given this seems part of a larger change that seem to be streamed into HEAD and I have probably missed a posting or heads up or something on net@ [if someone could point me at that it would be very helpful], I appreciate things being broken into smaller reviewable bits. I have no clear idea of what the end goal is or will be or look like, which makes it hard to comment on design decisions. I however, as I have stated in the past, would really really appreciate each change in PB, with the proposed commit message, and allow a few days of review or for people to comment on. I have spend two years on fixing bugs on the previous rewrite of that code. I am not exactly looking forward to see history repeat itself. Thanks, Bjoern _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
