On 06/21/15 09:44, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 6/21/15, Pedro Giffuni <p...@freebsd.org> wrote:
On 06/21/15 06:49, Oliver Pinter wrote:
...
Btw, is there anyone, who tries to compile the _recent_ head or
10-STABLE with gcc-4.x>= ?
Sure, MIPS, powerpc and sparc64 still use gcc-4.2.1 so
every time we run a tinderbox it's tested. More recently
jenkins also runs builds with gcc-4.9.
https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9/
Yes, I known about gcc-4.2, but who uses older gcc than 4.0 (that's
why I wrote gcc-4.x >= ) with recent HEAD (11-CURRENT) ?
ohh .. then you wrote is not what you meant ...
I agree no one should be using ancient compilers but it may
be that some downstream FreeBSD consumers are using
custom compilers that still need a C90 or C89 support.
As I wrote, I tried to get the core team to deprecate at least
gcc-2.8.1 so I could use variadic macros in cdefs.h and there
was no consensus. (The topic may still be under debate for
for all I know)
Pedro.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
