On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:24:24AM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
> Having more tools use libxo will definitely make it easier to write tools
> like Eagleeye.
>
Having more tools use libxo means having more broken tools.
% w --libxo
w: missing libxo option
OK. Let's check the manpage.
% man w
SYNOPSIS
w [--libxo] [-dhin] [-M core] [-N system] [user ...]
--libxo doesn't take an optarg. The only other use of
libxo in w(1) is the libxo(3) cross-reference.
% man 3 libxo
(search on --libxo)
Output can then be generated in various style, using the "--libxo"
option.
The only appearance of --libxo is in the above sentence. Great.
So, what are these fictitious optargs and why are they not
documented?
--
Steve
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
