On 14 June 2015 at 10:10, Steve Kargl <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 11:22:03AM +0100, Bruce Simpson wrote: >> >> But I have yet to see a coherent argument here -- size(1) numbers, RSS >> figures etc. -- about how it allegedly adds bloat. Most of what I've >> seen so far is POLA, NIH resistance, and hand-wavery. >> > > It is not alleged. I actaully measured the bloat libxo > caused when w(1) was converted. > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2015-March/054917.html > > Here's the bloat with ls(1) > > % ldd /bin/ls > /bin/ls: > libutil.so.9 => /lib/libutil.so.9 (0x2807d000) > libncursesw.so.8 => /lib/libncursesw.so.8 (0x2808f000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x280db000) > % ll /bin/ls > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 28568 Jun 7 21:01 /bin/ls* > > % ldd /bin/ls > /bin/ls: > libutil.so.9 => /lib/libutil.so.9 (0x2807d000) > libncursesw.so.8 => /lib/libncursesw.so.8 (0x2808f000) > libxo.so.0 => /lib/libxo.so.0 (0x280db000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x280ec000) > laptop-kargl:kargl[204] ll /bin/ls > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 31376 Jun 14 10:06 /bin/ls*
Plus 60k for the shared library. I don't mind that too much right now - it's around an extra 4k of overhead per binary right now. -adrian _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
