On Apr 4, 2014, at 5:33 PM, David Chisnall <thera...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> The slight problem, however, is that we would still like to be able to build > the base system with a more or less standard C compiler. Blocks are in clang > and are slowly making their way into commercial compilers, but the only two > versions of gcc that support them are the ones shipped by Apple and FreeBSD. Huh. Can I ask what specific need is driving that? As you point out, you’ve got clang and you’ve also got the blocks support from Apple gcc back-ported, so that covers all the architectures you could possibly want to generate code for. Wanting to hold base to some retro K&R standard for its own sake seems… weird… so I must be missing some part of the need statement, hence my question? Thanks, - Jordan _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
