On Friday, December 13, 2013 3:48:12 am Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > > LINT64 is yet another kernel config covered by 'make tinderbox', but not by > > the periodic tinderbox. It is probably worth adding to the periodic > > tinderbox > > (someday it'd be nice if the two tinderboxes built the same set of things). > > Some day it would be nice if people talked to me directly instead of > sniping from the sidelines.
Ah, but when people have raised this exact issue before (that tcbuild and 'make tinderbox' build different things), you have blown them off repeatedly. > The root issue here is that "make LINT" is poorly implemented, so under > some circumstances (including the tinderbox and, if I read the code > correctly, 'make universe'), the LINT64 config is never generated. Agreed on that front. > Oh, and 'make tinderbox' should die. No, it is very developer friendly as it Just Works(tm) as a single command from an existing source tree checkout. It also happens to build more of the tree than the periodic tinderbox (by building more kernel configs, albeit doing quite a bit of duplicate work for platforms like arm in the process). -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
