On 19 Jun 2013, at 16:13, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > portsnap does not work for src. (I thought we had already covered that > in earlier threads?) portsnap only moves forward. It is a very important > feature for our users that whatever tool they use for source updating be > bidirectional. In particular it is very common practice to use a bisect > operation to isolate changes responsible for regressions.
Freebsd-update can manage the src tree. I'm not entirely clear on what use-case we are addressing here. Is it: - FreeBSD developers, who are probably okay with installing a port, but would prefer a version that didn't depend on kitchen/sink? - Users, who wish to be able to update the source tree and then either build world, or build some optional parts that are not part of the default install? - Some other category of svn consumer? I think having a definitive statement as to the intention of svnlite would help frame the discussion in a more productive format. David _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
