On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:57 AM Florian Smeets <f...@smeets.xyz> wrote:
> On 26.08.19 06:28, Jan Sucan wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I can implement it. I suppose that ping6's manual page should be kept it > > this case. > > > > I was also thinking about printing a warning for each option renamed to > > lead a willing user to use the new unified option set of ping. It could > > be either only with -v, or by default and suppressed with -q. Or should > > the option translation be completely transparent? > > Is there an update on this? I found out the hard way today, as I updated > my icinga2 host from an revision before this change to a current > revision. In this case it's not as easy as fixing a script e.g. > net-mgmt/monitoring-plugins check_ping command calls /sbin/ping6 with -X. > > Will we get a ping6 that is fully backward compatible, or should we > start fixing ports? > > Thanks, > Florian > Still a work in progress, though there hasn't been any progress lately. https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21434 _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
