On 7/31/19 12:42 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 10:08:39AM -0700, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 7/30/19 10:14 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >>> No, you should create a situation where the python process ends the endless >>> loop, as reported. Then, it should become killable by 9 with the first >>> chunk only applied. >>> >> >> I don't have an easy way to test that. kill -9 inside the loop didn't >> work. Once the loop ended the process was done; it is very short lived >> and the calling code is buried in Python I think. > With only the umtxq_check_susp() chunk applied, you would wait for > python to start looping, then verify that kill -9 works. > > Anyway, I believe that the change is correct, and put the review at > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21124. I will commit after it get some > sanity checking by mentioned people. >
Right. I did that earlier and it did not work. I can try again shortly. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
