On 7/30/19 10:14 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 08:40:28PM -0700, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> This 2nd change alone (&& count1 == 0) was sufficient to fix the endless >> loop problem. > Good, thank you. > >> >> I am not sure how to test the umtxq_check_susp() change. Do I just need >> to ptrace the process? > > No, you should create a situation where the python process ends the endless > loop, as reported. Then, it should become killable by 9 with the first > chunk only applied. >
I don't have an easy way to test that. kill -9 inside the loop didn't work. Once the loop ended the process was done; it is very short lived and the calling code is buried in Python I think. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
