On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:49:55AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 08:31:17AM +0000, Steven Hartland wrote: > > Personally I disagree, chances of people finding that option in dd > > is slim, a dedicated trim utility makes much more sense to me. Sure > > have both that's cool but keep the trim would be my vote.
Having both is OK when there's no code duplication involved (e.g. like hd(1) being a handy hardlink to hexdump(1)), yet again... > I also like the idea of a simple dedicated tool with an obvious name. ... "Obvious" names can cut both ways. They can be too generic and thus create a clash in the future. They can be ambiguous ("trim" can just as easily be a tool that excessive whitespace from text files). ./danfe _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"