Personally I disagree, chances of people finding that option in dd is
slim, a dedicated trim utility makes much more sense to me. Sure have
both that's cool but keep the trim would be my vote.
On 30/11/2018 01:17, Cy Schubert wrote:
Agreed.
---
Sent using a tiny phone keyboard.
Apologies for any typos and autocorrect.
Also, this old phone only supports top post. Apologies.
Cy Schubert
<cy.schub...@cschubert.com> or <c...@freebsd.org>
The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
---
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Alexey Dokuchaev
Sent: 29/11/2018 17:01
To: Maxim Sobolev
Cc: eu...@freebsd.org; svn-src-head@freebsd.org;
svn-src-...@freebsd.org; src-committers
Subject: Re: svn: head/usr.bin: . trim
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:36:02AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Interesting. I have a similar functionality implemented as an option for
> the dd utility in my pipeline (conv=erase).
Which probably makes a better place rather than adding 4-letter program,
commonly named ("trim" is a simple word), into global namespace. :-/
./danfe
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
