On Fri Jan 7 11, Anonymous wrote: > Alexander Best <arun...@freebsd.org> writes: > > > On Thu Jan 6 11, John Baldwin wrote: > >> Note that that usage is rather pointless since it means you apply rtprio > >> to > >> the 'rtprio' process that is about to exit. :) > > > > yeah but at least it makes the usage of -X consistent. ;) also consider the > > following: the current shell has idle priority and you want to run rtprio in > > normal priority. then rtprio -t -0 would be a neat way of doing > > rtprio -t rtprio. ;) wel...not quite, because the priotity gets set to > > "NORMAL" > > when rtprio is almost finished running. ;) > > I think it'd be useful if the syntax allowed smth like > > $ rtprio 1 -0 -111 -222 -333 -444 -555 ...
defenately, but that would require quite some code. also please bear in mind: in its current form rtprio *DOES* process -0. my code doesn't change that. the only thing that it changes is that before hand -0 was processed *AND* then also executed. now the execution doesn't take place. cheers. alex > > > > > i admit using -0 for setting rtpio's own priority isn't very useful, but the > > rtprio(1) manual states: > > > > Pid of 0 means "the current process". -- a13x _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
