Alexander Best <arun...@freebsd.org> writes: > On Thu Jan 6 11, John Baldwin wrote: >> Note that that usage is rather pointless since it means you apply rtprio to >> the 'rtprio' process that is about to exit. :) > > yeah but at least it makes the usage of -X consistent. ;) also consider the > following: the current shell has idle priority and you want to run rtprio in > normal priority. then rtprio -t -0 would be a neat way of doing > rtprio -t rtprio. ;) wel...not quite, because the priotity gets set to > "NORMAL" > when rtprio is almost finished running. ;)
I think it'd be useful if the syntax allowed smth like $ rtprio 1 -0 -111 -222 -333 -444 -555 ... > > i admit using -0 for setting rtpio's own priority isn't very useful, but the > rtprio(1) manual states: > > Pid of 0 means "the current process". _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
