In message: <20100317171648.gd7...@hoeg.nl>
            Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl> writes:
: * M. Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote:
: > I agree with John this is too fine grained.  We don't currently have
: > this data for the removals, just when we did.  And it isn't clear that
: > our users could easily find this data either, even if we
: > dumpster-dived the repo for it.
: 
: I do think the same, but maybe in the future we should annotate compat
: bits like these in source by specific __FreeBSD_version?

Such annotations might be useful.  However, most (all?) of them will
be in the X00yyy, since we usually only demote code to compat status
on -head.  Users would likely almost always set this value to X00000.
Furthermore, you can't pick which of the things removed in release X
are omitted arbitrarily, just a point in a list.  This suggests, to my
mind at least, that we're adding extra complexity in selecting
compatibility bits, but not really providing much value add for that
complexity.  Am I missing something?

Warner
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to